[uWSGI] Surprised by the comment on uWSGI

Yann Malet yann.malet at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 13:58:55 CET 2010


You know how much some people care about this quantitative comparison. This
is why I brought this to your attention.

Regards,
--yml

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Roberto De Ioris <roberto at unbit.it> wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 20:17 -0400, Yann Malet wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I don't know if this post is yet on your radar but I am a bit
> > surprised by his comment on uWSGI.
> > * http://basicverbs.com/benchmark-of-django-deployment-techniques/
> >
> >
> > I haven't at yet a chance to read this carrefully but this might be
> > the same kind of issue that I run into a couple of weeks ago.
> > Regards,
>
>
> Probably.
>
> The author started with 1 process (no concurrency), then 5 (when the
> other engines spawn at least 6) then 25 (!!!) that obviously filled the
> (little) memory available.
>
> It is very hard to do this kind of benchmark (expecially on uWSGI as you
> know), but without reading the documentation of the project you are
> testing, is even harder :)
>
>
> --
> Roberto De Ioris
> http://unbit.it
> JID: roberto at jabber.unbit.it
>
> _______________________________________________
> uWSGI mailing list
> uWSGI at lists.unbit.it
> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.unbit.it/pipermail/uwsgi/attachments/20100121/bb99299e/attachment.htm 


More information about the uWSGI mailing list