yann.malet at gmail.com
Fri Jan 22 14:43:56 CET 2010
Do you think that the uwsgi could be compiled and installed using (distutils
and setuptools) ?
I am not a big fan of this module being "auto-magically" added at runtime.
Could you let me know what is the reasoning behind this "magic" ? This
remembers me this : http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Roberto De Ioris <roberto at unbit.it> wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 22/01/2010 alle 09.33 -0400, Yann Malet ha scritto:
> > Roberto,
> > Yeah there is few things to decide. for me everything live isolated in
> > a virtualenv. But I understand that for a production server people
> > would prefer to have a globally installed packaged (apt-get install).
> > So it seems that both scenario are important and I don't think that it
> > would be hard to support them once uwsgi python module adhere to the
> > common python installation standard (setuptools, distutils). In fact I
> > see 2 things that I don't know yet how to name :
> > * the first one is the uwsgi binary (the command line that we use to
> > start the uwsgi server)
> > * uwsgi python module the one used by the django app : "uwsgi_admin"
> warning, the "uwsgi" module does not exist. It is embedded in your app
> by the uwsgi server, so the only file to manage here is the uwsgi binary
> Roberto De Ioris <roberto at unbit.it>
> uWSGI mailing list
> uWSGI at lists.unbit.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the uWSGI