[uWSGI] [IMPORTANT] License change (less restrictive ;)

Jorge Gallegos kad at blegh.net
Wed Oct 9 06:54:23 CEST 2013


A question, because I'm curious: did you consider using LGPLv2? I
believe in essence this is the same. Of course I am not a license
expert, or lawyer, or anything even close.


Cheers

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:42:45PM +0200, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone, the uWSGI license (for both 1.4 and 1.9) has been updated to
> 
> GPL2 + linking exception
> 
> instead of GPL2
> 
> this should solve any issue when linking non-gpl compatible libraries and
> when using libuwsgi.so in commercial products.
> 
> The spirit of the uWSGI licensing should be now more straight:
> 
> """
> unless you modify it and you do not want to release the patches to the
> world, you are free to use it in the way you want
> """
> 
> -- 
> Roberto De Ioris
> http://unbit.it
> _______________________________________________
> uWSGI mailing list
> uWSGI at lists.unbit.it
> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

-- 
~kad
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.unbit.it/pipermail/uwsgi/attachments/20131008/06505990/attachment.pgp>


More information about the uWSGI mailing list